We introduce 7 processes and formats that help you bring structure to your project or venture.

This tool selection was curated by Martin from the Neue Narrative team.
Every start-up founder knows this: the organisation grows, structures can’t keep up, and at some point the organisational operating system no longer fits the new reality and expectations. That’s okay and part of the process. Organisational life is ultimately a series of stumbles from one organisational crisis to the next.
Still, I want to encourage founders, even in early stages, to regularly focus on how work is done and to actively shape that how.
Sure, in the short term this doesn’t feel efficient, because the outcomes are more abstract than newly acquired customers or optimised margins. In the long run, though, it’ll save you a lot of energy, promise.
In this article, I’ve put together pragmatic processes and workshop formats that help founders become organisational pros.
As organisations grow, it becomes harder to keep track of how everything fits together. Questions about roles, strategy or decision-making often remain implicit for too long.
The New Work Canvas helps teams step back and reflect on the key building blocks of their organisation. Instead of focusing on individual problems, you look at the bigger picture.
The canvas is structured around nine organisational spaces, including: Purpose, People, Roles & rules, Strategy, Relationships, Results, Values & principles, Ownership, Money
By working through these areas together, teams can identify where they already have clarity and where important questions still need answers.
Role-based work comes from the self-organisation movement and, in my view, is the most functional infrastructure for organising a team. In every founding journey, there’s a point where intuitive, barely formalised organising stops working. This usually shows up as a lack of clarity about who’s actually responsible for what.
The “Roles Picture” tool helps you turn real activities into clear clusters of responsibility and make them transparent on cards. Each role consists of
Start-ups often have many ideas and goals at the same time. The challenge is turning them into a clear strategy the whole team can focus on. The Using OKRs with Agile Strategy process helps teams define shared objectives and make progress measurable. Instead of detailed long-term planning, it provides direction while staying flexible.
The process includes four steps:
The result is a shared strategy that helps teams stay aligned and focused.
There are hundreds of strategic frameworks for founders. In my experience, (almost) all of them are too complex. In the first three to five years of a new company, it’s usually enough to define two or three focus topics per quarter and align everyone around them.
The first prioritisation tool founders need is “A before B statements”. It identifies and prioritises conflicting goals by deciding which goal is more important, for now. This method, also known as “even-over statements”, ensures the team focuses on what truly matters and reduces unnecessary strain.
The team collects all current goals and identifies conflicts to decide which goals take priority in the current phase. The goal is to define a maximum of three main priorities and communicate them clearly.
What A before B statements are for the team, this exercise is for you as an individual. The “Set priorities and follow through” tool is a personal reflection routine that helps you see with absolute clarity what truly matters to you and act accordingly.
In my view, the canvas is so useful because it helps clarify what you don’t want. It’s structured around six questions, each with additional sub-questions:
As a founder, you’ll spend a large share of your (meeting) time in one-to-one meetings. That’s why it’s important to have a format you feel comfortable with and that reliably delivers the outcomes you need.
The 1:1 sync meeting is a super simple format that does exactly what it’s meant to do: it works. The tool gives you a clear standard agenda you can use straight away. You can then add any agenda items you’re missing, for example:
From my perspective, this process should be part of every founder’s standard toolkit. Some decisions simply can’t be made pragmatically by a single person based on their role or responsibilities. They require a participatory process instead. What really matters here is that you don’t just decide somehow, but follow clear steps that lead to a transparent and well-considered decision.
In my view, there’s no better tool for this than the integrative decision-making process. The process starts with one person describing a tension they’re experiencing, followed by a concrete proposal to resolve that tension. The group then asks clarifying questions to better understand the proposal. In a reaction round, each participant shares their perspective on it. The person who brought in the proposal can then adapt and refine it based on the feedback.
After an objection round, you ideally arrive at a solution that is "safe enough to try" — meaning it may not be everyone’s favourite option, but it’s good and safe enough to start moving forward with.